Peanuts and Popcorn and Arthroscopic Surgery?
A recent Boston Globe article reported that the New England Patriots, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Brigham And Women's Hospital have partnered in a new sports medicine clinic in Foxborough, part of the Patriot Place complex the Kraft family is building around Gillette Stadium.
The plan has been generally well-received, but isn't sitting well with everyone. Some community hospitals view the partnership as yet another attempt by Boston's academic medical centers to strip the highest paying services, such as MRIs and outpatient surgical procedures, out of local hospitals.
The Foxborough facility completes a competitive horseshoe around the greater Boston area by Partners HealthCare, the parent company of Mass General and Brigham, that will draw patients from as far south as Rhode Island. The facility will be approximately half the size of a small community hospital, but provide care in some of the most lucrative specialties. It will have four operating rooms and a collection of advanced imaging machines. Up to 30 primary and specialty care physicians will work at the facility.
Similarly, Tufts-New England Medical Center plans to build a suburban facility on a yet-to-be-chosen site; it's been reviewing sites in Waltham and Westwood. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and New England Baptist Hospital are establishing satellite orthopaedics services at Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Needham. Cardiac care, orthopaedics, and oncology services are common "halo" services. It would be surprising if similar satellite services for cardiac care and oncology aren't already in the works.
Academic medical centers/tertiary care facilities creating feeder networks of community hospitals and outpatient surgery centers through ownership or affiliation isn't a new healthcare business strategy. University Hospitals of Cleveland and the Cleveland Clinic began utilizing a similar strategy in the late 80s and early 1990s, more or less successfully. Subsequently, some surrounding community hospitals merged with each other or shut down, decreasing access and increasing healthcare costs. The Boston market should expect similar fallout.
Patient outcomes, however, should be the factor determining the success of this continuing trend. If patients gain access to higher quality care, yielding improved outcomes, then the Foxborough facility is a successful community benefit. If not, then the move is strictly a financial one meant to leech the few remaining dollars available to community hospitals whose mission to provide access to high quality, low cost care will suffer as a consequence.■
Recent Comments